Dec 11, 2008

Intelligent Design, Creationism and Darwinism are buzzing and alive on the Internet

Charles Darwin's 1837 sketch, his first diagra...

Image via Wikipedia

Charles Darwin's 1837 sketch, his first diagram of an evolutionary tree from his First Notebook on Transmutation of Species (1837) on view at the the Museum of Natural History in Manhattan.

As long as Darwinists degrade those who question and hold up other possible explanations for life, as long as they hold their theory as a Dogma of Faith for the Scientific Community, as long as they hold life as an evolutionary accident and Science Fact the controversy will not die . . .

Below is a one day sample of Internet activity on this subject.

 

 Charles Darwin Bicentenary
By viviennemackie
The controversy between ‘Evolution’ and ‘Creation’ has raged very strongly at times in the 150 years since Darwin’s book was published, and recently another contender, ‘Intelligent Design’, has entered the fray. ...
Around and About with Viv - http://viviennemackie.wordpress.com/

Darwinism and Wikipedia
By mynym
It’s interesting that Martin Luther still receives more attention in the entry than Darwin does given that the Nazis themselves said that their beliefs had more to do with Darwin than Martin Luther. Their entry on Intelligent Design ...
Intelligent Design and More - http://www.intelldesign.com/

Darwin Worship Material
By Matthew Angle
James McGrath over at Exploring Our Matrix has a fun post here, about material that is meant to be used in churches to celebrate Darwin and evolution. The PDF even has a great little quip about the dangers of Intelligent Design. ...
Analytic Angles - http://analyticangles.wordpress.com/

 

This one looks really interesting, however, I feel the title and the overall gist of the article is positioned on evolution as . . . advancement of complexity over time and therefore at odds with creationists.  BUT.  The main point in this article is : Designer vs Atheism (Accident).  Muslim scientists are pro designer and anti accident.  So am I.  Anyway . . . let the debate rage on.

Muslim Scientists Prepare for Battle With Creationists
FOXNews - USA
A Harris poll conducted in November found 47 percent of Americans accept Darwin’s theory of evolution while 40 percent believe instead in creationism. ...
See other stories on this topic

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

1 comment:

bobxxxx said...

As long as Darwinists degrade those who question and hold up other possible explanations for life, as long as they hold their theory as a Dogma of Faith for the Scientific Community, as long as they hold life as an evolutionary accident and Science Fact the controversy will not die.

They're called biologists, not darwinists. The reason they call evolution a fact is because it has so much evidence. The evolution deniers don't understand this evidence and they don't even know about the most powerful evidence for evolution. (For an example, click my name to watch a video about ERVs.)

If you think scientific facts require faith, then you don't even know what science is. Scientists don't "believe" in scientific ideas. They accept or reject scientific ideas depending on how much evidence there is. If they are not sure about a scientific hypothesis, they test it, trying to disprove it. Only after an idea is repeatedly and successfully tested by many scientists, does the idea get accepted by the scientific community. And if any future research disproves it, the idea is modified or thrown out. That's what science is all about, disproving things. Evolution has been tested for 150 years and it's passed every test. That's why it's accepted as a fact.

Just please remember religious ideas require faith. Scientific ideas require evidence and evolution has tons of it.

Please see the video I recommended and then tell me evolution is not a fact. The evidence this video describes is so powerful, it would be impossible for a person with any intelligence to deny it.

Unfortunately many religious people automatically reject scientific evidence, no matter how powerful it is, and no matter how patiently a scientist explains it, because there's some religious boundary they are afraid to cross.

... the controversy will not die.

This controversy is a myth. There is no controversy in the scientific community about the basic facts of evolution. All evolution deniers are non-scientists (except for a handful of incompetent scientists who work for Bible colleges and who have never contributed anything important to biology), and all evolution deniers have a problem with evolution because of religious reasons.

Whether or not you publish my comments, at least see the video. A little education never killed anyone.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUxLR9hdorI